Biogas sector MRV can provide a wealth of data that can be used to improve GHG emissions inventories.
According to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (published in 2006 and subsequently refined, most recently in 2019), there are typically three key methodological considerations for estimating emissions from a particular source:
Many governments currently use Tier 1 methods for emissions categories in the biogas sector, which can often result in +/-50 percent uncertainty for biogas sector categories.
Opportunities for using data acquired through MRV to advance to higher-tier methods include:
Biogas project MRV can help inform national mitigation targets in NDCs and enable national governments to better track their progress toward mitigation commitments.
NDCs outline a countries’ efforts to reduce national emissions and contribute to the achievement of the long-term goals set forth in the Paris Agreement.
The first round of NDCs were submitted in anticipation of and shortly after the adoption of the Paris Agreement in 2015. Countries are asked to update their NDCs every five years, and as of November 2021, over 150 countries have submitted a new or updated NDC.
NDCs will be reviewed as part of a global “stocktake” of efforts toward achieving global mitigation targets, the first of which will be conducted in 2023 (and every five years thereafter).
Research indicates that without significant reductions in short-lived climate pollutants, such as methane, global temperature increases will exceed 2.0°C by 2100.
As the biogas sector is responsible for approximately 20 percent of anthropogenic methane emissions, actions in this sector can play a critical role in meeting global mitigation targets.
As governments develop their NDCs, they can consider integrating efforts to mitigate biogas methane emissions by:
There are common principles and best practices for measurement, reporting, and verification of emissions reductions for each of these types of biogas projects.
Government agencies can use the best practices outlined here to develop MRV systems and plans that are tailored toward their specific needs. These principles support the basic requirements of any emissions accounting framework, as identified below.
From a bottom-up perspective, the most important component of MRV is the measurement of data. This core component provides the basis for claiming emissions reductions from the action(s) taken.
The main activity for measurement is the collection and management of data and information to support documentation of emissions reductions. Developing and implementing a comprehensive measurement plan is a critical step in this process. A measurement plan provides facility personnel with a blueprint of key steps, including defining what data and information need to be collected (e.g., gas flow rates), how the data and information need to be collected, how data are checked for accuracy, and how to aggregate and summarize the data to determine the GHG reductions achieved.
Monitoring and data collection equipment will often fail or have interruptions during a monitoring period. Frequently, emissions mitigation programs will have specific requirements and methods to substitute for missing data.
Without specific guidance, projects should seek to use methods that are reasonable, supported by other data during the measurement period, and are conservative in nature.
IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories include methods for resolving data gaps using techniques such as overlap, surrogate data, interpolation, and trend extrapolation.
Reporting is intended to track and store GHG information and inform interested parties of results. Reports might need to be submitted to:
Aligning with the best practice of quantifying emissions reductions annually, most programs require annual reporting of GHG emissions and reductions. Programs may have more frequent deadlines for reporting monitoring data.
Verification is intended to provide assurance on the methodologies used to quantify mitigation actions and the quality of data reported. It can also serve as a tool and learning process for project operators by raising awareness about opportunities for continuous improvement.
The level of effort required for verification is most affected by project-specific conditions, data management, and the requirements of a particular reporting program.
As a best practice, GHG data and information should be verified by a third-party verification body, which will ensure impartiality and reduce risks, while increasing the reliability of both data and any emissions offsets as a result of mitigation efforts.
Verifications should be conducted to a verification standard and specified criteria. The standard could be the International Organization for Standardization 14064-3:2019 Greenhouse Gases – Part 3: Specification with Guidance for the Verification and Validation of Greenhouse Gas Statements; or a standard developed specifically for the reporting program or country.
The verification must include more than an assessment of the reported emissions reductions. It should include an assessment of project boundaries, documentation checks, onsite inspections, a review of measurement and metering methods and equipment, an assessment of data collection and management systems, and an independent calculation of emissions reductions achieved by the project.
While it is a best practice to report annually, verification could be completed every other year, every three years, or even less frequently if an initial verification is conducted early in the mitigation project’s lifecycle.
Almost all programs require the project to be physically visited during its initial verification of the measurement period. After this initial visit, requirements for when another visit needs to occur vary widely.
Resources for understanding and conducting MRV are listed below. For a more complete list of MRV resources, protocols, standards, and tools see GMI’s MRV Handbook.
GMI provides several tools and resources for measuring emissions and emissions reductions for the biogas sector.